GPT Audio Paid vs o4 Mini Paid
GPT Audio vs o4 Mini compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
GPT Audio — full profile › · o4 Mini — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$10 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$4.4 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
GPT Audio vs o4 Mini specs
| Spec | GPT Audio | o4 Mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | OpenAI | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 200K tokens | |
| Input price | $2.5/M | $1.1/M | |
| Output price | $10/M | $4.4/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | No | Yes | |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
o4 Mini is ~2.3× cheaper than GPT Audio on output tokens ($4.4 vs $10 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 200K context window
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | GPT Audio | o4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✗ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: GPT Audio vs o4 Mini
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How GPT Audio and o4 Mini score
| Criterion | GPT Audio | o4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Context window | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
GPT Audio Paid
The gpt-audio model is OpenAI's first generally available audio model. The new snapshot features an upgraded decoder for more natural sounding voices and maintains better voice consistency. Audio is priced...
o4 Mini Paid
OpenAI o4-mini is a compact reasoning model in the o-series, optimized for fast, cost-efficient performance while retaining strong multimodal and agentic capabilities. It supports tool use and demonstrates competitive reasoning...
Other models in these families
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
Frequently asked questions
GPT Audio vs o4 Mini — which is cheaper?
o4 Mini is cheaper on output ($4.4/M vs $10/M).
Which has the larger context window?
o4 Mini offers the larger context window (200K tokens).
GPT Audio vs o4 Mini — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose o4 Mini for the lower output price ($4.4/M vs $10/M). It also gives you the larger 200K context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →