AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-6 Astra Paid vs SCExtract Paid

GPT-6 Astra vs Extract compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

GPT-6 Astra — full profile › · Extract — full profile ›

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-6 AstraPaidOpenAI

$10 /M input
$50 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)

TypeProprietary

Context window1.1M tokens

MultimodalYes

Self-hostNo

SCExtractPaidScaledown

$0.04 /M input
Free /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)

TypeProprietary

Context window1M tokens

MultimodalYes

Self-hostNo

Choose Extract for the lower output price (Free/M vs $50/M). Choose GPT-6 Astra if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

GPT-6 Astra vs Extract specs

Spec	GPT-6 Astra	Extract	Winner
Maker	OpenAI	Scaledown	–
Type	Proprietary	Proprietary	–
Context window	1.1M tokens	1M tokens	GPT-6 Astra
Input price	$10/M	$0.04/M	SCExtract
Output price	$50/M	Free/M	SCExtract
Vision / multimodal	Yes	Yes	= Tie
Tool / function calling	Yes	No	GPT-6 Astra
Self-hostable	No (API only)	No (API only)	–
License	Proprietary	Proprietary	–

Price gap & when to choose each

Choose GPT-6 Astra if…

You want frontier performance through a managed API
You need the longer 1.1M context window
You value reliability & ecosystem
You don't want to manage infrastructure

SCChoose Extract if…

You want frontier performance through a managed API
You want the lower output price
You value reliability & ecosystem
You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capability	GPT-6 Astra	Extract
Open weights (downloadable)	✗	✗
Self-hostable	✗	✗
Runs fully offline	✗	✗
Vision / multimodal	✓	✓
Tool / function calling	✓	✗
1M+ context window	✓	✓

Benchmarks: GPT-6 Astra vs Extract

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT-6 Astra

Extract

Intelligence index

52.7

–

Coding index

76.9

–

GPQA

96.1%

–

Humanity's Last Exam

54.7%

–

Long Context Reasoning

80.7%

–

SciCode

56.5%

–

τ-Bench Banking

41.4%

–

Terminal-Bench

88.4%

–

Speed

64.3 tok/s

–

Latency

164.71s

–

Intelligence per $

2.6

–

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-6 Astra and Extract score

🏆 Best value & openness: Extract (3.2 vs 2.9 / 5)

Criterion	GPT-6 Astra	Extract
Cost-efficiency	2.0	5.0
Context window	5.0	5.0
Openness	1.5	1.5
Self-hosting	1.0	1.0
Multimodality	5.0	3.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-6 Astra Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-6 Astra is OpenAI's flagship model for demanding end-to-end work. It is suited for advanced analysis, software engineering, deep research, scientific work, and document creation, with particular strengths in long-horizon...

Extract Paid

Scaledown · Proprietary

Extract is a description-driven entity extraction model from ScaleDown. Instead of a fixed set of entity types, callers describe the fields they want in plain English through `provider.options.scaledown.entities`, and the...

Frequently asked questions

GPT-6 Astra vs Extract — which is cheaper?

Extract is cheaper on output (Free/M vs $50/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-6 Astra offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

GPT-6 Astra vs Extract — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Extract for the lower output price (Free/M vs $50/M). Choose GPT-6 Astra if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

People also compare

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6 Astra DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Extract GLM 5.3 (batch) vs GPT-6 Astra GLM 5.3 (batch) vs Extract Hy3 vs GPT-6 Astra Hy3 vs Extract

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →