AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-6 Astra Pro Paid vs MAWeaver (alpha) Paid

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Weaver (alpha) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-6 Astra ProPaidOpenAI
$10 /M input
$50 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
MAWeaver (alpha)PaidMancer
$0.4 /M input
$0.75 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window8K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Weaver (alpha) for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $50/M). Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Weaver (alpha) specs

SpecGPT-6 Astra ProWeaver (alpha)Winner
MakerOpenAIMancer
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens8K tokensGPT-6 Astra Pro
Input price$10/M$0.4/MMAWeaver (alpha)
Output price$50/M$0.75/MMAWeaver (alpha)
Vision / multimodalYesNoGPT-6 Astra Pro
Tool / function callingYesNoGPT-6 Astra Pro
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

67×cheaper per output token

Weaver (alpha) is ~67× cheaper than GPT-6 Astra Pro on output tokens ($0.75 vs $50 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1.1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
MAChoose Weaver (alpha) if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-6 Astra ProWeaver (alpha)
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

How GPT-6 Astra Pro and Weaver (alpha) score

🏆 Best value & openness: GPT-6 Astra Pro (2.9 vs 2.3 / 5)
CriterionGPT-6 Astra ProWeaver (alpha)
Cost-efficiency2.05.0
Context window5.02.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.02.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-6 Astra Pro Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-6 Astra Pro is the same underlying model as [GPT-6 Astra](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-6-astra), served with `reasoning.mode` set to `pro` for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://develope

Weaver (alpha) Paid

Mancer · Proprietary

An attempt to recreate Claude-style verbosity, but don't expect the same level of coherence or memory. Meant for use in roleplay/narrative situations.

Frequently asked questions

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Weaver (alpha) — which is cheaper?

Weaver (alpha) is cheaper on output ($0.75/M vs $50/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-6 Astra Pro offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Weaver (alpha) — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Weaver (alpha) for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $50/M). Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →