AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-6 Astra Pro Paid vs Seed 1.6 Flash Paid

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Seed 1.6 Flash compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-6 Astra ProPaidOpenAI
$10 /M input
$50 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Seed 1.6 FlashPaidByteDance Seed
$0.08 /M input
$0.3 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Seed 1.6 Flash for the lower output price ($0.3/M vs $50/M). Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Seed 1.6 Flash specs

SpecGPT-6 Astra ProSeed 1.6 FlashWinner
MakerOpenAIByteDance Seed
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens262K tokensGPT-6 Astra Pro
Input price$10/M$0.08/MSeed 1.6 Flash
Output price$50/M$0.3/MSeed 1.6 Flash
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

167×cheaper per output token

Seed 1.6 Flash is ~167× cheaper than GPT-6 Astra Pro on output tokens ($0.3 vs $50 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1.1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Seed 1.6 Flash if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-6 Astra ProSeed 1.6 Flash
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

How GPT-6 Astra Pro and Seed 1.6 Flash score

🏆 Best value & openness: Seed 1.6 Flash (3.3 vs 2.9 / 5)
CriterionGPT-6 Astra ProSeed 1.6 Flash
Cost-efficiency2.05.0
Context window5.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-6 Astra Pro Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-6 Astra Pro is the same underlying model as [GPT-6 Astra](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-6-astra), served with `reasoning.mode` set to `pro` for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://develope

Seed 1.6 Flash Paid

ByteDance Seed · Proprietary

Seed 1.6 Flash is an ultra-fast multimodal deep thinking model by ByteDance Seed, supporting both text and visual understanding. It features a 256k context window and can generate outputs of...

Frequently asked questions

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Seed 1.6 Flash — which is cheaper?

Seed 1.6 Flash is cheaper on output ($0.3/M vs $50/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-6 Astra Pro offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Seed 1.6 Flash — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Seed 1.6 Flash for the lower output price ($0.3/M vs $50/M). Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →