AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-6 Astra Pro Paid vs GPT-4o Paid

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs GPT-4o compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-6 Astra ProPaidOpenAI
$10 /M input
$50 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-4oPaidOpenAI
$2.5 /M input
$10 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-4o for the lower output price ($10/M vs $50/M). Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs GPT-4o specs

SpecGPT-6 Astra ProGPT-4oWinner
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens128K tokensGPT-6 Astra Pro
Input price$10/M$2.5/MGPT-4o
Output price$50/M$10/MGPT-4o
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

5.0×cheaper per output token

GPT-4o is ~5.0× cheaper than GPT-6 Astra Pro on output tokens ($10 vs $50 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1.1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-4o if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-6 Astra ProGPT-4o
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT-6 Astra Pro vs GPT-4o

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT-6 Astra Pro
GPT-4o
Intelligence index
9
Math index
25.7
GPQA
65.5%
MMLU-Pro
80.3%
Humanity's Last Exam
4%
LiveCodeBench
42.5%
MATH-500
89.3%
AIME
32.7%
AIME 2025
25.7%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-6 Astra Pro and GPT-4o score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.9 vs 2.9 / 5).
CriterionGPT-6 Astra ProGPT-4o
Cost-efficiency2.03.5
Context window5.03.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-6 Astra Pro Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-6 Astra Pro is the same underlying model as [GPT-6 Astra](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-6-astra), served with `reasoning.mode` set to `pro` for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://develope

GPT-4o Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-4o ("o" for "omni") is OpenAI's latest AI model, supporting both text and image inputs with text outputs. It maintains the intelligence level of [GPT-4 Turbo](/models/openai/gpt-4-turbo) while being twice as...

Frequently asked questions

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs GPT-4o — which is cheaper?

GPT-4o is cheaper on output ($10/M vs $50/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-6 Astra Pro offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs GPT-4o — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-4o for the lower output price ($10/M vs $50/M). Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →