AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-6 Astra Pro Paid vs Claude Fable 5 Paid

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Claude Fable 5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-6 Astra ProPaidOpenAI
$10 /M input
$50 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Claude Fable 5PaidAnthropic
$10 /M input
$50 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro for the lower output price ($50/M vs $50/M). It also gives you the larger 1.1M context window.

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Claude Fable 5 specs

SpecGPT-6 Astra ProClaude Fable 5Winner
MakerOpenAIAnthropic
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens1M tokensGPT-6 Astra Pro
Input price$10/M$10/M= Tie
Output price$50/M$50/M= Tie
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1.1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Claude Fable 5 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-6 Astra ProClaude Fable 5
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Claude Fable 5

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT-6 Astra Pro
Claude Fable 5
Intelligence index
49.7
Coding index
76.5
GPQA
92.6%
Humanity's Last Exam
55.5%
Long Context Reasoning
82.3%
SciCode
61%
IFBench
63.5%
τ²-Bench
98.5%
τ-Bench Banking
38.1%
Terminal-Bench
84.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
62.9%
Speed
70 tok/s
Latency
60.71s
Intelligence per $
2.5

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-6 Astra Pro and Claude Fable 5 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.9 vs 2.9 / 5).
CriterionGPT-6 Astra ProClaude Fable 5
Cost-efficiency2.02.0
Context window5.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-6 Astra Pro Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-6 Astra Pro is the same underlying model as [GPT-6 Astra](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-6-astra), served with `reasoning.mode` set to `pro` for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://develope

Claude Fable 5 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Fable 5 is a Mythos-class model from Anthropic, built for autonomous knowledge work and coding. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and...

Frequently asked questions

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Claude Fable 5 — which is cheaper?

GPT-6 Astra Pro is cheaper on output ($50/M vs $50/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-6 Astra Pro offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Claude Fable 5 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro for the lower output price ($50/M vs $50/M). It also gives you the larger 1.1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →