AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-6 Astra Pro (batch) Paid vs Seed 2.1 Turbo Paid

GPT-6 Astra Pro (batch) vs Seed 2.1 Turbo compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-6 Astra Pro (batch)PaidOpenAI
$5 /M input
$25 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Seed 2.1 TurboPaidByteDance Seed
$0.5 /M input
$2.5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Seed 2.1 Turbo for the lower output price ($2.5/M vs $25/M). Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro (batch) if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

GPT-6 Astra Pro (batch) vs Seed 2.1 Turbo specs

SpecGPT-6 Astra Pro (batch)Seed 2.1 TurboWinner
MakerOpenAIByteDance Seed
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens262K tokensGPT-6 Astra Pro (batch)
Input price$5/M$0.5/MSeed 2.1 Turbo
Output price$25/M$2.5/MSeed 2.1 Turbo
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

10×cheaper per output token

Seed 2.1 Turbo is ~10× cheaper than GPT-6 Astra Pro (batch) on output tokens ($2.5 vs $25 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro (batch) if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1.1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Seed 2.1 Turbo if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-6 Astra Pro (batch)Seed 2.1 Turbo
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

How GPT-6 Astra Pro (batch) and Seed 2.1 Turbo score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.1 vs 3.2 / 5).
CriterionGPT-6 Astra Pro (batch)Seed 2.1 Turbo
Cost-efficiency3.04.5
Context window5.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-6 Astra Pro (batch) Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-6 Astra Pro is the same underlying model as [GPT-6 Astra](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-6-astra), served with `reasoning.mode` set to `pro` for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://develope

Seed 2.1 Turbo Paid

ByteDance Seed · Proprietary

Seed 2.1 Turbo is a multimodal model from ByteDance Seed for coding and long-horizon agent workflows. It is suited for end-to-end software delivery, multi-step task execution, and understanding visual and...

Frequently asked questions

GPT-6 Astra Pro (batch) vs Seed 2.1 Turbo — which is cheaper?

Seed 2.1 Turbo is cheaper on output ($2.5/M vs $25/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-6 Astra Pro (batch) offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

GPT-6 Astra Pro (batch) vs Seed 2.1 Turbo — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Seed 2.1 Turbo for the lower output price ($2.5/M vs $25/M). Choose GPT-6 Astra Pro (batch) if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →