AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-5.6 Terra Paid vs Solar Pro 3 Paid

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Solar Pro 3 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-5.6 TerraPaidOpenAI
$2 /M input
$12 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Solar Pro 3PaidUpstage
$0.15 /M input
$0.6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Solar Pro 3 for the lower output price ($0.6/M vs $12/M). Choose GPT-5.6 Terra if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Solar Pro 3 specs

SpecGPT-5.6 TerraSolar Pro 3Winner
MakerOpenAIUpstage
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens131K tokensGPT-5.6 Terra
Input price$2/M$0.15/MSolar Pro 3
Output price$12/M$0.6/MSolar Pro 3
Vision / multimodalYesNoGPT-5.6 Terra
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

20×cheaper per output token

Solar Pro 3 is ~20× cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra on output tokens ($0.6 vs $12 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-5.6 Terra if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1.1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Solar Pro 3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-5.6 TerraSolar Pro 3
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT-5.6 Terra vs Solar Pro 3

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Solar Pro 3 delivers 3.2× more intelligence per dollar.
GPT-5.6 Terra
Solar Pro 3
Intelligence index
42.3
7.8
Coding index
76.7
16.2
GPQA
92.5%
72.4%
Humanity's Last Exam
42.9%
10.3%
Long Context Reasoning
83%
32.3%
SciCode
55%
25.5%
IFBench
71.2%
71.2%
τ²-Bench
86.3%
86.3%
τ-Bench Banking
40.2%
8.7%
Terminal-Bench
88%
12%
Terminal-Bench Hard
57.6%
7.6%
Speed
115.5 tok/s
157.2 tok/s
Latency
107.22s
1.33s
Intelligence per $
9.4
29.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-5.6 Terra and Solar Pro 3 score

🏆 Best value & openness: GPT-5.6 Terra (3.2 vs 2.9 / 5)
CriterionGPT-5.6 TerraSolar Pro 3
Cost-efficiency3.55.0
Context window5.03.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-5.6 Terra Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-5.6 Terra is a balanced model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series, positioned between the flagship Sol tier and the cost-efficient Luna tier. It is suited for everyday coding, reasoning, and agentic...

Solar Pro 3 Paid

Upstage · Proprietary

Solar Pro 3 is Upstage's powerful Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model. With 102B total parameters and 12B active parameters per forward pass, it delivers exceptional performance while maintaining computational efficiency. Optimized...

Frequently asked questions

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Solar Pro 3 — which is cheaper?

Solar Pro 3 is cheaper on output ($0.6/M vs $12/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.6 Terra offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Solar Pro 3 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Solar Pro 3 for the lower output price ($0.6/M vs $12/M). Choose GPT-5.6 Terra if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →