AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-5.6 Sol Paid vs SASakana Namazu Paid

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Sakana Namazu compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-5.6 SolPaidOpenAI
$2 /M input
$10 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
SASakana NamazuPaidSakana AI
$0.95 /M input
$4 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Sakana Namazu for the lower output price ($4/M vs $10/M). Choose GPT-5.6 Sol if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Sakana Namazu specs

SpecGPT-5.6 SolSakana NamazuWinner
MakerOpenAISakana AI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens262K tokensGPT-5.6 Sol
Input price$2/M$0.95/MSASakana Namazu
Output price$10/M$4/MSASakana Namazu
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

2.5×cheaper per output token

Sakana Namazu is ~2.5× cheaper than GPT-5.6 Sol on output tokens ($4 vs $10 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-5.6 Sol if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1.1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
SAChoose Sakana Namazu if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-5.6 SolSakana Namazu
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT-5.6 Sol vs Sakana Namazu

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT-5.6 Sol
Sakana Namazu
Intelligence index
47.1
Coding index
77.4
GPQA
94.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
49.5%
Long Context Reasoning
84%
SciCode
57.1%
IFBench
72.7%
τ²-Bench
85.1%
τ-Bench Banking
44.3%
Terminal-Bench
88%
Terminal-Bench Hard
65.9%
Speed
68.7 tok/s
Latency
124.83s
Intelligence per $
5.9

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-5.6 Sol and Sakana Namazu score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.2 vs 3.1 / 5).
CriterionGPT-5.6 SolSakana Namazu
Cost-efficiency3.54.0
Context window5.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-5.6 Sol Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series. It is suited for complex reasoning, coding, and agentic workflows, and is particularly strong at command-line and multi-step coding tasks...

Sakana Namazu Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Sakana Namazu is a Japanese-specialized reasoning model from Sakana AI, based on Kimi K2.6 with additional training for Japanese language and business contexts. It is suited for Japanese instruction following,...

Frequently asked questions

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Sakana Namazu — which is cheaper?

Sakana Namazu is cheaper on output ($4/M vs $10/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.6 Sol offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Sakana Namazu — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Sakana Namazu for the lower output price ($4/M vs $10/M). Choose GPT-5.6 Sol if you need the larger 1.1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →