GPT-5.6 Luna Paid vs 
Claude Haiku 4.5 Paid
GPT-5.6 Luna vs Claude Haiku 4.5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
GPT-5.6 Luna — full profile › · Claude Haiku 4.5 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · OpenSourceAI.tech
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
GPT-5.6 Luna vs Claude Haiku 4.5 specs
| Spec | GPT-5.6 Luna | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Anthropic |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.1M tokens | 200K tokens |
| Input price | $1/M | $1/M |
| Output price | $6/M | $5/M |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Feature comparison
| Capability | GPT-5.6 Luna | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How GPT-5.6 Luna and Claude Haiku 4.5 score
| Criterion | GPT-5.6 Luna | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
GPT-5.6 Luna Paid
GPT-5.6 Luna is a fast, cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series. It is suited for high-volume, latency-sensitive tasks such as chat, classification, and lightweight agentic workflows, providing capable reasoning for...
Claude Haiku 4.5 Paid
Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s fastest and most efficient model, delivering near-frontier intelligence at a fraction of the cost and latency of larger Claude models. Matching Claude Sonnet 4’s performance...
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.6 Luna vs Claude Haiku 4.5 — which is cheaper?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on output ($5/M vs $6/M).
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Luna offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).
GPT-5.6 Luna vs Claude Haiku 4.5 — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for the lower output price ($5/M vs $6/M). Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if you need the larger 1.1M context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →