AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-5.2 Chat Paid vs Sonar Reasoning Pro Paid

GPT-5.2 Chat vs Sonar Reasoning Pro compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-5.2 ChatPaidOpenAI
$1.75 /M input
$14 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Sonar Reasoning ProPaidPerplexity
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Sonar Reasoning Pro for the lower output price ($8/M vs $14/M). Choose GPT-5.2 Chat if you need the larger 128K context window.

GPT-5.2 Chat vs Sonar Reasoning Pro specs

SpecGPT-5.2 ChatSonar Reasoning ProWinner
MakerOpenAIPerplexity
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K tokens128K tokens= Tie
Input price$1.75/M$2/MGPT-5.2 Chat
Output price$14/M$8/MSonar Reasoning Pro
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesNoGPT-5.2 Chat
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

1.8×cheaper per output token

Sonar Reasoning Pro is ~1.8× cheaper than GPT-5.2 Chat on output tokens ($8 vs $14 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-5.2 Chat if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Sonar Reasoning Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-5.2 ChatSonar Reasoning Pro
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT-5.2 Chat vs Sonar Reasoning Pro

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT-5.2 Chat
Sonar Reasoning Pro
Intelligence index
17
11.8
Math index
51
GPQA
71.2%
MMLU-Pro
81.4%
Humanity's Last Exam
8%
Long Context Reasoning
45.7%
LiveCodeBench
66.9%
AIME 2025
51%
IFBench
47.4%
τ²-Bench
46.5%
τ-Bench Banking
11.1%
Terminal-Bench Hard
31.8%
MATH-500
95.7%
AIME
79%
Speed
0 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
0s
Intelligence per $
3.5

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-5.2 Chat and Sonar Reasoning Pro score

🏆 Best value & openness: GPT-5.2 Chat (2.9 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionGPT-5.2 ChatSonar Reasoning Pro
Cost-efficiency3.53.5
Context window3.53.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-5.2 Chat Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-5.2 Chat (AKA Instant) is the fast, lightweight member of the 5.2 family, optimized for low-latency chat while retaining strong general intelligence. It uses adaptive reasoning to selectively “think” on...

Sonar Reasoning Pro Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Note: Sonar Pro pricing includes Perplexity search pricing. See [details here](https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/pricing#detailed-pricing-breakdown-for-sonar-reasoning-pro-and-sonar-pro) Sonar Reasoning Pro is a premier reasoning model powe

Frequently asked questions

GPT-5.2 Chat vs Sonar Reasoning Pro — which is cheaper?

Sonar Reasoning Pro is cheaper on output ($8/M vs $14/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.2 Chat offers the larger context window (128K tokens).

GPT-5.2 Chat vs Sonar Reasoning Pro — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Sonar Reasoning Pro for the lower output price ($8/M vs $14/M). Choose GPT-5.2 Chat if you need the larger 128K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →