GPT-5.2 Chat Paid vs 
Grok 4.6 Paid
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Grok 4.6 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
GPT-5.2 Chat — full profile › · Grok 4.6 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$14 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Grok 4.6 specs
| Spec | GPT-5.2 Chat | Grok 4.6 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | xAI | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 500K tokens | |
| Input price | $1.75/M | $2/M | |
| Output price | $14/M | $6/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Grok 4.6 is ~2.3× cheaper than GPT-5.2 Chat on output tokens ($6 vs $14 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 500K context window
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | GPT-5.2 Chat | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: GPT-5.2 Chat vs Grok 4.6
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How GPT-5.2 Chat and Grok 4.6 score
| Criterion | GPT-5.2 Chat | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Context window | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
GPT-5.2 Chat Paid
GPT-5.2 Chat (AKA Instant) is the fast, lightweight member of the 5.2 family, optimized for low-latency chat while retaining strong general intelligence. It uses adaptive reasoning to selectively “think” on...
Grok 4.6 Paid
Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.
Other models in these families
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Grok 4.6 — which is cheaper?
Grok 4.6 is cheaper on output ($6/M vs $14/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Grok 4.6 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Grok 4.6 — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Grok 4.6 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $14/M). It also gives you the larger 500K context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →