GPT-5.2 Chat Paid vs 
Claude Haiku 4.5 Paid
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Claude Haiku 4.5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
GPT-5.2 Chat — full profile › · Claude Haiku 4.5 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$14 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Claude Haiku 4.5 specs
| Spec | GPT-5.2 Chat | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Anthropic | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 200K tokens | |
| Input price | $1.75/M | $1/M | |
| Output price | $14/M | $5/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Claude Haiku 4.5 is ~2.8× cheaper than GPT-5.2 Chat on output tokens ($5 vs $14 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 200K context window
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | GPT-5.2 Chat | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: GPT-5.2 Chat vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How GPT-5.2 Chat and Claude Haiku 4.5 score
| Criterion | GPT-5.2 Chat | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Context window | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
GPT-5.2 Chat Paid
GPT-5.2 Chat (AKA Instant) is the fast, lightweight member of the 5.2 family, optimized for low-latency chat while retaining strong general intelligence. It uses adaptive reasoning to selectively “think” on...
Claude Haiku 4.5 Paid
Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s fastest and most efficient model, delivering near-frontier intelligence at a fraction of the cost and latency of larger Claude models. Matching Claude Sonnet 4’s performance...
Other models in these families
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Claude Haiku 4.5 — which is cheaper?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on output ($5/M vs $14/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Haiku 4.5 offers the larger context window (200K tokens).
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Claude Haiku 4.5 — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for the lower output price ($5/M vs $14/M). It also gives you the larger 200K context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →