AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-4o Paid vs Sonar Paid

GPT-4o vs Sonar compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-4oPaidOpenAI
$2.5 /M input
$10 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
SonarPaidPerplexity
$1 /M input
$1 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window127K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Sonar for the lower output price ($1/M vs $10/M). Choose GPT-4o if you need the larger 128K context window.

GPT-4o vs Sonar specs

SpecGPT-4oSonarWinner
MakerOpenAIPerplexity
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K tokens127K tokensGPT-4o
Input price$2.5/M$1/MSonar
Output price$10/M$1/MSonar
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesNoGPT-4o
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

10×cheaper per output token

Sonar is ~10× cheaper than GPT-4o on output tokens ($1 vs $10 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-4o if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 128K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Sonar if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-4oSonar
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT-4o vs Sonar

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT-4o
Sonar
Intelligence index
9
7.7
Math index
25.7
GPQA
65.5%
47.1%
MMLU-Pro
80.3%
68.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
4%
4.9%
LiveCodeBench
42.5%
29.5%
MATH-500
89.3%
81.7%
AIME
32.7%
48.7%
AIME 2025
25.7%
Speed
0 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
0s

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-4o and Sonar score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.9 vs 2.7 / 5).
CriterionGPT-4oSonar
Cost-efficiency3.54.5
Context window3.53.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-4o Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-4o ("o" for "omni") is OpenAI's latest AI model, supporting both text and image inputs with text outputs. It maintains the intelligence level of [GPT-4 Turbo](/models/openai/gpt-4-turbo) while being twice as...

Sonar Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Sonar is lightweight, affordable, fast, and simple to use — now featuring citations and the ability to customize sources. It is designed for companies seeking to integrate lightweight question-and-answer features...

Frequently asked questions

GPT-4o vs Sonar — which is cheaper?

Sonar is cheaper on output ($1/M vs $10/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-4o offers the larger context window (128K tokens).

GPT-4o vs Sonar — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Sonar for the lower output price ($1/M vs $10/M). Choose GPT-4o if you need the larger 128K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →