AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-4o Paid vs Solar Pro 4 Paid

GPT-4o vs Solar Pro 4 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-4oPaidOpenAI
$2.5 /M input
$10 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Solar Pro 4PaidUpstage
$0.09 /M input
$0.36 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window524K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Solar Pro 4 for the lower output price ($0.36/M vs $10/M). It also gives you the larger 524K context window.

GPT-4o vs Solar Pro 4 specs

SpecGPT-4oSolar Pro 4Winner
MakerOpenAIUpstage
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K tokens524K tokensSolar Pro 4
Input price$2.5/M$0.09/MSolar Pro 4
Output price$10/M$0.36/MSolar Pro 4
Vision / multimodalYesNoGPT-4o
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

28×cheaper per output token

Solar Pro 4 is ~28× cheaper than GPT-4o on output tokens ($0.36 vs $10 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-4o if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Solar Pro 4 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 524K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-4oSolar Pro 4
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT-4o vs Solar Pro 4

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT-4o
Solar Pro 4
Intelligence index
9
28.2
Math index
25.7
GPQA
65.5%
89.1%
MMLU-Pro
80.3%
Humanity's Last Exam
4%
29.2%
LiveCodeBench
42.5%
MATH-500
89.3%
AIME
32.7%
AIME 2025
25.7%
Coding index
52.7
Long Context Reasoning
74%
SciCode
44.6%
τ-Bench Banking
23.3%
Terminal-Bench
57.3%
Speed
0 tok/s
50.1 tok/s
Latency
0s
1.09s
Intelligence per $
53.7

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-4o and Solar Pro 4 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.9 vs 3.1 / 5).
CriterionGPT-4oSolar Pro 4
Cost-efficiency3.55.0
Context window3.54.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-4o Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-4o ("o" for "omni") is OpenAI's latest AI model, supporting both text and image inputs with text outputs. It maintains the intelligence level of [GPT-4 Turbo](/models/openai/gpt-4-turbo) while being twice as...

Solar Pro 4 Paid

Upstage · Proprietary

Solar Pro 4 is Upstage's cost-efficient large language model, featuring a 524K context window. It is built for long-horizon tasks and agentic workflows, with strong capabilities in office productivity, document-intensive...

Frequently asked questions

GPT-4o vs Solar Pro 4 — which is cheaper?

Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on output ($0.36/M vs $10/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Solar Pro 4 offers the larger context window (524K tokens).

GPT-4o vs Solar Pro 4 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Solar Pro 4 for the lower output price ($0.36/M vs $10/M). It also gives you the larger 524K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →