GPT-4 Paid vs MAWeaver (alpha) Paid
GPT-4 vs Weaver (alpha) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
GPT-4 — full profile › · Weaver (alpha) — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$60 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$0.75 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
GPT-4 vs Weaver (alpha) specs
| Spec | GPT-4 | Weaver (alpha) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Mancer | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 8K tokens | 8K tokens | |
| Input price | $30/M | $0.4/M | MAWeaver (alpha) |
| Output price | $60/M | $0.75/M | MAWeaver (alpha) |
| Vision / multimodal | No | No | – |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | No | |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Weaver (alpha) is ~80× cheaper than GPT-4 on output tokens ($0.75 vs $60 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 8K context window
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | GPT-4 | Weaver (alpha) |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✗ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✗ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: GPT-4 vs Weaver (alpha)
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How GPT-4 and Weaver (alpha) score
| Criterion | GPT-4 | Weaver (alpha) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| Context window | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 3.5 | 2.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
GPT-4 Paid
OpenAI's flagship model, GPT-4 is a large-scale multimodal language model capable of solving difficult problems with greater accuracy than previous models due to its broader general knowledge and advanced reasoning...
Weaver (alpha) Paid
An attempt to recreate Claude-style verbosity, but don't expect the same level of coherence or memory. Meant for use in roleplay/narrative situations.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-4 vs Weaver (alpha) — which is cheaper?
Weaver (alpha) is cheaper on output ($0.75/M vs $60/M).
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-4 offers the larger context window (8K tokens).
GPT-4 vs Weaver (alpha) — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Weaver (alpha) for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $60/M). Choose GPT-4 if you need the larger 8K context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →