AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-4 Turbo Paid vs GPT-5.2 Chat Paid

GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-5.2 Chat compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-4 TurboPaidOpenAI
$10 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-5.2 ChatPaidOpenAI
$1.75 /M input
$14 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-5.2 Chat for the lower output price ($14/M vs $30/M). Choose GPT-4 Turbo if you need the larger 128K context window.

GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-5.2 Chat specs

SpecGPT-4 TurboGPT-5.2 ChatWinner
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K tokens128K tokens= Tie
Input price$10/M$1.75/MGPT-5.2 Chat
Output price$30/M$14/MGPT-5.2 Chat
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

2.1×cheaper per output token

GPT-5.2 Chat is ~2.1× cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo on output tokens ($14 vs $30 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-4 Turbo if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-5.2 Chat if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-4 TurboGPT-5.2 Chat
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-5.2 Chat

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT-5.2 Chat delivers more intelligence per dollar.
GPT-4 Turbo
GPT-5.2 Chat
Intelligence index
7
17
Coding index
21.5
MMLU-Pro
69.4%
81.4%
Humanity's Last Exam
3.1%
8%
LiveCodeBench
29.1%
66.9%
MATH-500
73.7%
AIME
15%
Math index
51
GPQA
71.2%
Long Context Reasoning
45.7%
AIME 2025
51%
IFBench
47.4%
τ²-Bench
46.5%
τ-Bench Banking
11.1%
Terminal-Bench Hard
31.8%
Speed
0 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
0s
Intelligence per $
0.5
3.5

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-5.2 Chat score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.8 vs 2.9 / 5).
CriterionGPT-4 TurboGPT-5.2 Chat
Cost-efficiency3.03.5
Context window3.53.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-4 Turbo Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest GPT-4 Turbo model with vision capabilities. Vision requests can now use JSON mode and function calling. Training data: up to December 2023.

GPT-5.2 Chat Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-5.2 Chat (AKA Instant) is the fast, lightweight member of the 5.2 family, optimized for low-latency chat while retaining strong general intelligence. It uses adaptive reasoning to selectively “think” on...

Frequently asked questions

GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-5.2 Chat — which is cheaper?

GPT-5.2 Chat is cheaper on output ($14/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-4 Turbo offers the larger context window (128K tokens).

GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-5.2 Chat — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-5.2 Chat for the lower output price ($14/M vs $30/M). Choose GPT-4 Turbo if you need the larger 128K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →