AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-4 Turbo Paid vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) Paid

GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-4 TurboPaidOpenAI
$10 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)PaidOpenAI
$0.25 /M input
$0.75 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window16K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $30/M). Choose GPT-4 Turbo if you need the larger 128K context window.

GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) specs

SpecGPT-4 TurboGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)Winner
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K tokens16K tokensGPT-4 Turbo
Input price$10/M$0.25/MGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Output price$30/M$0.75/MGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Vision / multimodalYesNoGPT-4 Turbo
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

40×cheaper per output token

GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) is ~40× cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo on output tokens ($0.75 vs $30 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-4 Turbo if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 128K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-4 TurboGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) delivers 15× more intelligence per dollar.
GPT-4 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Intelligence index
7
5.5
Coding index
21.5
10.7
MMLU-Pro
69.4%
46.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
3.1%
LiveCodeBench
29.1%
MATH-500
73.7%
44.1%
AIME
15%
GPQA
29.7%
Speed
0 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
0s
Intelligence per $
0.5
7.3

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.8 vs 2.6 / 5).
CriterionGPT-4 TurboGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Cost-efficiency3.05.0
Context window3.52.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-4 Turbo Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest GPT-4 Turbo model with vision capabilities. Vision requests can now use JSON mode and function calling. Training data: up to December 2023.

GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-3.5 Turbo is OpenAI's fastest model. It can understand and generate natural language or code, and is optimized for chat and traditional completion tasks. Training data up to Sep 2021.

Frequently asked questions

GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) — which is cheaper?

GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) is cheaper on output ($0.75/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-4 Turbo offers the larger context window (128K tokens).

GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $30/M). Choose GPT-4 Turbo if you need the larger 128K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →