AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-4 Turbo Paid vs AIAion 3.5 Paid

GPT-4 Turbo vs Aion 3.5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-4 TurboPaidOpenAI
$10 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
AIAion 3.5PaidAionLabs
$3 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Aion 3.5 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 262K context window.

GPT-4 Turbo vs Aion 3.5 specs

SpecGPT-4 TurboAion 3.5Winner
MakerOpenAIAionLabs–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window128K tokens262K tokensAIAion 3.5
Input price$10/M$3/MAIAion 3.5
Output price$30/M$6/MAIAion 3.5
Vision / multimodalYesNoGPT-4 Turbo
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

5.0×cheaper per output token

Aion 3.5 is ~5.0× cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo on output tokens ($6 vs $30 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-4 Turbo if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
AIChoose Aion 3.5 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 262K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-4 TurboAion 3.5
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✗
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✗✗

Benchmarks: GPT-4 Turbo vs Aion 3.5

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT-4 Turbo
Aion 3.5
Intelligence index
7
–
Coding index
21.5
–
MMLU-Pro
69.4%
–
Humanity's Last Exam
3.1%
–
LiveCodeBench
29.1%
–
MATH-500
73.7%
–
AIME
15%
–
Speed
0 tok/s
–
Latency
0s
–
Intelligence per $
0.5
–

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-4 Turbo and Aion 3.5 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.8 vs 2.8 / 5).
CriterionGPT-4 TurboAion 3.5
Cost-efficiency3.04.0
Context window3.54.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-4 Turbo Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest GPT-4 Turbo model with vision capabilities. Vision requests can now use JSON mode and function calling. Training data: up to December 2023.

Aion 3.5 Paid

AionLabs · Proprietary

Aion 3.5 is a multi-model roleplaying and storytelling system from AionLabs, built on the GLM family of models. It uses a collaborative generation process in which multiple specialized models each...

Frequently asked questions

GPT-4 Turbo vs Aion 3.5 — which is cheaper?

Aion 3.5 is cheaper on output ($6/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Aion 3.5 offers the larger context window (262K tokens).

GPT-4 Turbo vs Aion 3.5 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Aion 3.5 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 262K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →