AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT-4.1 Paid vs AMNova Lite 1.0 Paid

GPT-4.1 vs Nova Lite 1.0 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT-4.1PaidOpenAI
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
AMNova Lite 1.0PaidAmazon
$0.06 /M input
$0.24 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window300K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Nova Lite 1.0 for the lower output price ($0.24/M vs $8/M). Choose GPT-4.1 if you need the larger 1M context window.

GPT-4.1 vs Nova Lite 1.0 specs

SpecGPT-4.1Nova Lite 1.0Winner
MakerOpenAIAmazon
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens300K tokensGPT-4.1
Input price$2/M$0.06/MAMNova Lite 1.0
Output price$8/M$0.24/MAMNova Lite 1.0
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

33×cheaper per output token

Nova Lite 1.0 is ~33× cheaper than GPT-4.1 on output tokens ($0.24 vs $8 per M tokens).

Choose GPT-4.1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
AMChoose Nova Lite 1.0 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT-4.1Nova Lite 1.0
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT-4.1 vs Nova Lite 1.0

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT-4.1
Nova Lite 1.0
Intelligence index
12.7
Math index
34.7
GPQA
66.6%
MMLU-Pro
80.6%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.2%
Long Context Reasoning
68.3%
LiveCodeBench
45.7%
MATH-500
91.3%
AIME
43.7%
AIME 2025
34.7%
IFBench
43%
τ²-Bench
47.1%
Terminal-Bench Hard
13.6%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
Intelligence per $
3.6

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT-4.1 and Nova Lite 1.0 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.2 vs 3.3 / 5).
CriterionGPT-4.1Nova Lite 1.0
Cost-efficiency3.55.0
Context window5.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT-4.1 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-4.1 is a flagship large language model optimized for advanced instruction following, real-world software engineering, and long-context reasoning. It supports a 1 million token context window and outperforms GPT-4o and...

Nova Lite 1.0 Paid

Amazon · Proprietary

Amazon Nova Lite 1.0 is a very low-cost multimodal model from Amazon that focused on fast processing of image, video, and text inputs to generate text output. Amazon Nova Lite...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
GPT-4.1 (batch)GPT-4.1 MiniGPT-4.1 Mini (batch)GPT-4.1 NanoGPT-4.1 Nano (batch)

Frequently asked questions

GPT-4.1 vs Nova Lite 1.0 — which is cheaper?

Nova Lite 1.0 is cheaper on output ($0.24/M vs $8/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-4.1 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

GPT-4.1 vs Nova Lite 1.0 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Nova Lite 1.0 for the lower output price ($0.24/M vs $8/M). Choose GPT-4.1 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →