AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Gemini 3.5 Flash Paid vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Paid

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Gemini 3.5 Flash — full profile ›  ·  Claude Haiku 4.5 — full profile ›

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · OpenSourceAI.tech

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for the lower output price ($5/M vs $9/M). Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash if you need the larger 1M context window.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5 specs

SpecGemini 3.5 FlashClaude Haiku 4.5
MakerGoogleAnthropic
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens200K tokens
Input price$1.5/M$1/M
Output price$9/M$5/M
Vision / multimodalYesYes
Tool / function callingYesYes
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityGemini 3.5 FlashClaude Haiku 4.5
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✓✗

Benchmarks: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Claude Haiku 4.5
Intelligence index
50.2
–
Coding index
70.1
–
GPQA
92.2%
–
Humanity's Last Exam
41%
–
Long Context Reasoning
69.3%
–
SciCode
53.1%
–
IFBench
76.3%
–
τ²-Bench
95.3%
–
τ-Bench Banking
25.4%
–
Terminal-Bench
78.7%
–
Terminal-Bench Hard
40.9%
–
Speed
293.7 tok/s
–
Latency
12.74s
–
Intelligence per $
14.9
–

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude Haiku 4.5 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.2 vs 3.1 / 5).
CriterionGemini 3.5 FlashClaude Haiku 4.5
Cost-efficiency3.54.0
Context window5.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Gemini 3.5 Flash Paid

Google · Proprietary

Gemini 3.5 Flash is Google's high-efficiency multimodal model, bringing near-Pro level coding and reasoning at Flash-tier cost and speed. It is highly optimized for coding proficiency and parallel agentic execution...

Claude Haiku 4.5 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s fastest and most efficient model, delivering near-frontier intelligence at a fraction of the cost and latency of larger Claude models. Matching Claude Sonnet 4’s performance...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGemini 2.5 Flash

Frequently asked questions

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5 — which is cheaper?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on output ($5/M vs $9/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for the lower output price ($5/M vs $9/M). Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 FlashDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5GLM 5.2 vs Gemini 3.5 FlashGLM 5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5MiniMax M3 vs Gemini 3.5 FlashMiniMax M3 vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →