AI Models · Paid vs Paid

SAFugu Ultra Paid vs Sonar Paid

Fugu Ultra vs Sonar compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

SAFugu UltraPaidSakana AI
$5 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
SonarPaidPerplexity
$1 /M input
$1 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window127K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Sonar for the lower output price ($1/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra if you need the larger 1M context window.

Fugu Ultra vs Sonar specs

SpecFugu UltraSonarWinner
MakerSakana AIPerplexity
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens127K tokensSAFugu Ultra
Input price$5/M$1/MSonar
Output price$30/M$1/MSonar
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesNoSAFugu Ultra
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

30×cheaper per output token

Sonar is ~30× cheaper than Fugu Ultra on output tokens ($1 vs $30 per M tokens).

SAChoose Fugu Ultra if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Sonar if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityFugu UltraSonar
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Fugu Ultra vs Sonar

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Fugu Ultra
Sonar
Intelligence index
7.7
GPQA
47.1%
MMLU-Pro
68.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.9%
LiveCodeBench
29.5%
MATH-500
81.7%
AIME
48.7%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Fugu Ultra and Sonar score

🏆 Best value & openness: Fugu Ultra (3.1 vs 2.7 / 5)
CriterionFugu UltraSonar
Cost-efficiency3.04.5
Context window5.03.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Fugu Ultra Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Fugu Ultra is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to route...

Sonar Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Sonar is lightweight, affordable, fast, and simple to use — now featuring citations and the ability to customize sources. It is designed for companies seeking to integrate lightweight question-and-answer features...

Frequently asked questions

Fugu Ultra vs Sonar — which is cheaper?

Sonar is cheaper on output ($1/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Fugu Ultra offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Fugu Ultra vs Sonar — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Sonar for the lower output price ($1/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →