SAFugu Ultra Paid vs 
Saba Paid
Fugu Ultra vs Saba compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
Fugu Ultra — full profile › · Saba — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$0.6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
Fugu Ultra vs Saba specs
| Spec | Fugu Ultra | Saba | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Sakana AI | Mistral AI | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 33K tokens | SAFugu Ultra |
| Input price | $5/M | $0.2/M | |
| Output price | $30/M | $0.6/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | No | SAFugu Ultra |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Saba is ~50× cheaper than Fugu Ultra on output tokens ($0.6 vs $30 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 1M context window
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | Fugu Ultra | Saba |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: Fugu Ultra vs Saba
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How Fugu Ultra and Saba score
| Criterion | Fugu Ultra | Saba |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 2.5 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
Fugu Ultra Paid
Fugu Ultra is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to route...
Saba Paid
Mistral Saba is a 24B-parameter language model specifically designed for the Middle East and South Asia, delivering accurate and contextually relevant responses while maintaining efficient performance. Trained on curated regional...
Frequently asked questions
Fugu Ultra vs Saba — which is cheaper?
Saba is cheaper on output ($0.6/M vs $30/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Fugu Ultra offers the larger context window (1M tokens).
Fugu Ultra vs Saba — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Saba for the lower output price ($0.6/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra if you need the larger 1M context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →