AI Models · Paid vs Paid

SAFugu Ultra Paid vs RERelace Search Paid

Fugu Ultra vs Relace Search compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Fugu Ultra — full profile ›  ·  Relace Search — full profile ›

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

SAFugu UltraPaidSakana AI
$5 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
RERelace SearchPaidRelace
$1 /M input
$3 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window256K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Relace Search for the lower output price ($3/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra if you need the larger 1M context window.

Fugu Ultra vs Relace Search specs

SpecFugu UltraRelace SearchWinner
MakerSakana AIRelace–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window1M tokens256K tokensSAFugu Ultra
Input price$5/M$1/MRERelace Search
Output price$30/M$3/MRERelace Search
Vision / multimodalYesNoSAFugu Ultra
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

10×cheaper per output token

Relace Search is ~10× cheaper than Fugu Ultra on output tokens ($3 vs $30 per M tokens).

SAChoose Fugu Ultra if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
REChoose Relace Search if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityFugu UltraRelace Search
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✗
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✓✗

How Fugu Ultra and Relace Search score

🏆 Best value & openness: Fugu Ultra (3.1 vs 2.8 / 5)
CriterionFugu UltraRelace Search
Cost-efficiency3.04.0
Context window5.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Fugu Ultra Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Fugu Ultra is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to route...

Relace Search Paid

Relace · Proprietary

The relace-search model uses 4-12 `view_file` and `grep` tools in parallel to explore a codebase and return relevant files to the user request. In contrast to RAG, relace-search performs agentic...

Frequently asked questions

Fugu Ultra vs Relace Search — which is cheaper?

Relace Search is cheaper on output ($3/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Fugu Ultra offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Fugu Ultra vs Relace Search — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Relace Search for the lower output price ($3/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Hy3 vs Fugu UltraHy3 vs Relace SearchGLM 5.3 vs Fugu UltraGLM 5.3 vs Relace SearchDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Fugu UltraDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Relace Search

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →