AI Models · Paid vs Paid

SAFugu Ultra Paid vs INMercury 2 Paid

Fugu Ultra vs Mercury 2 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

SAFugu UltraPaidSakana AI
$5 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
INMercury 2PaidInception
$0.25 /M input
$0.75 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Mercury 2 for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra if you need the larger 1M context window.

Fugu Ultra vs Mercury 2 specs

SpecFugu UltraMercury 2Winner
MakerSakana AIInception
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens128K tokensSAFugu Ultra
Input price$5/M$0.25/MINMercury 2
Output price$30/M$0.75/MINMercury 2
Vision / multimodalYesNoSAFugu Ultra
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

40×cheaper per output token

Mercury 2 is ~40× cheaper than Fugu Ultra on output tokens ($0.75 vs $30 per M tokens).

SAChoose Fugu Ultra if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
INChoose Mercury 2 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityFugu UltraMercury 2
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Fugu Ultra vs Mercury 2

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Fugu Ultra
Mercury 2
Intelligence index
11.5
Coding index
31.1
GPQA
77%
Humanity's Last Exam
17.1%
Long Context Reasoning
43.7%
SciCode
37.7%
IFBench
69.8%
τ²-Bench
70.8%
τ-Bench Banking
9.5%
Terminal-Bench
27.3%
Terminal-Bench Hard
26.5%
Speed
1011.9 tok/s
Latency
4.14s
Intelligence per $
30.7

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Fugu Ultra and Mercury 2 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.1 vs 2.9 / 5).
CriterionFugu UltraMercury 2
Cost-efficiency3.05.0
Context window5.03.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Fugu Ultra Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Fugu Ultra is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to route...

Mercury 2 Paid

Inception · Proprietary

Mercury 2 is an extremely fast reasoning LLM, and the first reasoning diffusion LLM (dLLM). Instead of generating tokens sequentially, Mercury 2 produces and refines multiple tokens in parallel, achieving...

Frequently asked questions

Fugu Ultra vs Mercury 2 — which is cheaper?

Mercury 2 is cheaper on output ($0.75/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Fugu Ultra offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Fugu Ultra vs Mercury 2 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Mercury 2 for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →