AI Models · Paid vs Paid

SAFugu Ultra Paid vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) Paid

Fugu Ultra vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

SAFugu UltraPaidSakana AI
$5 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)PaidOpenAI
$1 /M input
$2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window4K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) for the lower output price ($2/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra if you need the larger 1M context window.

Fugu Ultra vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) specs

SpecFugu UltraGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Winner
MakerSakana AIOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens4K tokensSAFugu Ultra
Input price$5/M$1/MGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Output price$30/M$2/MGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Vision / multimodalYesNoSAFugu Ultra
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

15×cheaper per output token

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) is ~15× cheaper than Fugu Ultra on output tokens ($2 vs $30 per M tokens).

SAChoose Fugu Ultra if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityFugu UltraGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Fugu Ultra vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Fugu Ultra
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Intelligence index
5.5
Coding index
10.7
GPQA
29.7%
MMLU-Pro
46.2%
MATH-500
44.1%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
Intelligence per $
7.3

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Fugu Ultra and GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) score

🏆 Best value & openness: Fugu Ultra (3.1 vs 2.5 / 5)
CriterionFugu UltraGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Cost-efficiency3.04.5
Context window5.02.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Fugu Ultra Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Fugu Ultra is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to route...

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-3.5 Turbo is OpenAI's fastest model. It can understand and generate natural language or code, and is optimized for chat and traditional completion tasks. Training data up to Sep 2021.

Frequently asked questions

Fugu Ultra vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) — which is cheaper?

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) is cheaper on output ($2/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Fugu Ultra offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Fugu Ultra vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) for the lower output price ($2/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →