AI Models · Paid vs Paid

SAFugu Ultra v2 Paid vs Sonar Paid

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Sonar compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

SAFugu Ultra v2PaidSakana AI
$5 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
SonarPaidPerplexity
$1 /M input
$1 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window127K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Sonar for the lower output price ($1/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra v2 if you need the larger 1M context window.

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Sonar specs

SpecFugu Ultra v2SonarWinner
MakerSakana AIPerplexity
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens127K tokensSAFugu Ultra v2
Input price$5/M$1/MSonar
Output price$30/M$1/MSonar
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesNoSAFugu Ultra v2
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

30×cheaper per output token

Sonar is ~30× cheaper than Fugu Ultra v2 on output tokens ($1 vs $30 per M tokens).

SAChoose Fugu Ultra v2 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Sonar if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityFugu Ultra v2Sonar
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Fugu Ultra v2 vs Sonar

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Fugu Ultra v2
Sonar
Intelligence index
7.7
GPQA
47.1%
MMLU-Pro
68.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.9%
LiveCodeBench
29.5%
MATH-500
81.7%
AIME
48.7%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Fugu Ultra v2 and Sonar score

🏆 Best value & openness: Fugu Ultra v2 (3.1 vs 2.7 / 5)
CriterionFugu Ultra v2Sonar
Cost-efficiency3.04.5
Context window5.03.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Fugu Ultra v2 Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Fugu Ultra v2 is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to...

Sonar Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Sonar is lightweight, affordable, fast, and simple to use — now featuring citations and the ability to customize sources. It is designed for companies seeking to integrate lightweight question-and-answer features...

Frequently asked questions

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Sonar — which is cheaper?

Sonar is cheaper on output ($1/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Fugu Ultra v2 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Sonar — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Sonar for the lower output price ($1/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra v2 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →