AI Models · Paid vs Paid

SAFugu Ultra v2 Paid vs RERelace Apply 3 Paid

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Relace Apply 3 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

SAFugu Ultra v2PaidSakana AI
$5 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
RERelace Apply 3PaidRelace
$0.85 /M input
$1.25 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window256K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Relace Apply 3 for the lower output price ($1.25/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra v2 if you need the larger 1M context window.

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Relace Apply 3 specs

SpecFugu Ultra v2Relace Apply 3Winner
MakerSakana AIRelace
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens256K tokensSAFugu Ultra v2
Input price$5/M$0.85/MRERelace Apply 3
Output price$30/M$1.25/MRERelace Apply 3
Vision / multimodalYesNoSAFugu Ultra v2
Tool / function callingYesNoSAFugu Ultra v2
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

24×cheaper per output token

Relace Apply 3 is ~24× cheaper than Fugu Ultra v2 on output tokens ($1.25 vs $30 per M tokens).

SAChoose Fugu Ultra v2 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
REChoose Relace Apply 3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityFugu Ultra v2Relace Apply 3
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

How Fugu Ultra v2 and Relace Apply 3 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Fugu Ultra v2 (3.1 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionFugu Ultra v2Relace Apply 3
Cost-efficiency3.04.5
Context window5.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.02.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Fugu Ultra v2 Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Fugu Ultra v2 is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to...

Relace Apply 3 Paid

Relace · Proprietary

Relace Apply 3 is a specialized code-patching LLM that merges AI-suggested edits straight into your source files. It can apply updates from GPT-4o, Claude, and others into your files at...

Frequently asked questions

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Relace Apply 3 — which is cheaper?

Relace Apply 3 is cheaper on output ($1.25/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Fugu Ultra v2 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Relace Apply 3 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Relace Apply 3 for the lower output price ($1.25/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra v2 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →