AI Models · Paid vs Paid

SAFugu Ultra v2 Paid vs UNPareto 26.10 Preview Paid

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Pareto 26.10 Preview compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

SAFugu Ultra v2PaidSakana AI
$5 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
UNPareto 26.10 PreviewPaidUnbiased
$0.8 /M input
$3.2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Pareto 26.10 Preview for the lower output price ($3.2/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Pareto 26.10 Preview specs

SpecFugu Ultra v2Pareto 26.10 PreviewWinner
MakerSakana AIUnbiased–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window1M tokens1M tokensUNPareto 26.10 Preview
Input price$5/M$0.8/MUNPareto 26.10 Preview
Output price$30/M$3.2/MUNPareto 26.10 Preview
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

9.4×cheaper per output token

Pareto 26.10 Preview is ~9.4× cheaper than Fugu Ultra v2 on output tokens ($3.2 vs $30 per M tokens).

SAChoose Fugu Ultra v2 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
UNChoose Pareto 26.10 Preview if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityFugu Ultra v2Pareto 26.10 Preview
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✓✓

How Fugu Ultra v2 and Pareto 26.10 Preview score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.1 vs 3.3 / 5).
CriterionFugu Ultra v2Pareto 26.10 Preview
Cost-efficiency3.04.0
Context window5.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Fugu Ultra v2 Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Fugu Ultra v2 is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to...

Pareto 26.10 Preview Paid

Unbiased · Proprietary

Pareto is a multimodal composite model built for research, coding, and agentic workflows, while delivering frontier-level performance across a broad range of general-purpose tasks. This is a preview of the...

Frequently asked questions

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Pareto 26.10 Preview — which is cheaper?

Pareto 26.10 Preview is cheaper on output ($3.2/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Pareto 26.10 Preview offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Pareto 26.10 Preview — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Pareto 26.10 Preview for the lower output price ($3.2/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →