AI Models · Paid vs Paid

SAFugu Ultra v2 Paid vs o4 Mini Paid

Fugu Ultra v2 vs o4 Mini compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

SAFugu Ultra v2PaidSakana AI
$5 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
o4 MiniPaidOpenAI
$1.1 /M input
$4.4 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose o4 Mini for the lower output price ($4.4/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra v2 if you need the larger 1M context window.

Fugu Ultra v2 vs o4 Mini specs

SpecFugu Ultra v2o4 MiniWinner
MakerSakana AIOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens200K tokensSAFugu Ultra v2
Input price$5/M$1.1/Mo4 Mini
Output price$30/M$4.4/Mo4 Mini
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

6.8×cheaper per output token

o4 Mini is ~6.8× cheaper than Fugu Ultra v2 on output tokens ($4.4 vs $30 per M tokens).

SAChoose Fugu Ultra v2 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose o4 Mini if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityFugu Ultra v2o4 Mini
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Fugu Ultra v2 vs o4 Mini

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Fugu Ultra v2
o4 Mini
Intelligence index
16.7
Math index
90.7
GPQA
78.4%
MMLU-Pro
83.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
16.5%
Long Context Reasoning
61%
LiveCodeBench
85.9%
MATH-500
98.9%
AIME
94%
AIME 2025
90.7%
IFBench
68.7%
τ²-Bench
55.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
15.2%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
Intelligence per $
8.7

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Fugu Ultra v2 and o4 Mini score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.1 vs 3.1 / 5).
CriterionFugu Ultra v2o4 Mini
Cost-efficiency3.04.0
Context window5.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Fugu Ultra v2 Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Fugu Ultra v2 is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to...

o4 Mini Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

OpenAI o4-mini is a compact reasoning model in the o-series, optimized for fast, cost-efficient performance while retaining strong multimodal and agentic capabilities. It supports tool use and demonstrates competitive reasoning...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
o4 Mini Higho4 Mini (batch)

Frequently asked questions

Fugu Ultra v2 vs o4 Mini — which is cheaper?

o4 Mini is cheaper on output ($4.4/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Fugu Ultra v2 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Fugu Ultra v2 vs o4 Mini — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose o4 Mini for the lower output price ($4.4/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra v2 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →