AI Models · Paid vs Paid

SAFugu Ultra v2 Paid vs Muse Wonder Paid

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Muse Wonder compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

SAFugu Ultra v2PaidSakana AI
$5 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Muse WonderPaidMeta
$4 /M input
$20 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Muse Wonder for the lower output price ($20/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Muse Wonder specs

SpecFugu Ultra v2Muse WonderWinner
MakerSakana AIMeta–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window1M tokens1M tokensMuse Wonder
Input price$5/M$4/MMuse Wonder
Output price$30/M$20/MMuse Wonder
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

1.5×cheaper per output token

Muse Wonder is ~1.5× cheaper than Fugu Ultra v2 on output tokens ($20 vs $30 per M tokens).

SAChoose Fugu Ultra v2 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Muse Wonder if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityFugu Ultra v2Muse Wonder
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✓✓

Benchmarks: Fugu Ultra v2 vs Muse Wonder

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Fugu Ultra v2
Muse Wonder
Intelligence index
–
52.4
Humanity's Last Exam
–
50.1%
Long Context Reasoning
–
80.7%
SciCode
–
60.3%
Speed
–
154.7 tok/s
Latency
–
21.71s
Intelligence per $
–
6.6

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Fugu Ultra v2 and Muse Wonder score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.1 vs 3.1 / 5).
CriterionFugu Ultra v2Muse Wonder
Cost-efficiency3.03.0
Context window5.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Fugu Ultra v2 Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Fugu Ultra v2 is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to...

Muse Wonder Paid

Meta · Proprietary

Muse Wonder is a frontier reasoning model from Meta, designed for complex personal and professional agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents and returns text, with...

Frequently asked questions

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Muse Wonder — which is cheaper?

Muse Wonder is cheaper on output ($20/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Muse Wonder offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Muse Wonder — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Muse Wonder for the lower output price ($20/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →