AI Models · Paid vs Paid

SAFugu Ultra v2 Paid vs Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor Paid

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

SAFugu Ultra v2PaidSakana AI
$5 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Muse Spark 1.2 ContributorPaidMeta
$0.1 /M input
$0.2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor for the lower output price ($0.2/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor specs

SpecFugu Ultra v2Muse Spark 1.2 ContributorWinner
MakerSakana AIMeta
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens1M tokensMuse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Input price$5/M$0.1/MMuse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Output price$30/M$0.2/MMuse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

150×cheaper per output token

Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor is ~150× cheaper than Fugu Ultra v2 on output tokens ($0.2 vs $30 per M tokens).

SAChoose Fugu Ultra v2 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityFugu Ultra v2Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

How Fugu Ultra v2 and Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor score

🏆 Best value & openness: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor (3.5 vs 3.1 / 5)
CriterionFugu Ultra v2Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Cost-efficiency3.05.0
Context window5.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Fugu Ultra v2 Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Fugu Ultra v2 is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to...

Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor Paid

Meta · Proprietary

Muse Spark 1.2 contributor tier is a reasoning model from Meta designed for developers who want to start building at an even lower cost. It’s meaningfully cheaper than Muse Spark...

Frequently asked questions

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor — which is cheaper?

Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor is cheaper on output ($0.2/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor for the lower output price ($0.2/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →