Fugu Ultra v2 vs Ling 3.1 Flash compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
Fugu Ultra v2 — full profile › · Ling 3.1 Flash — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
| Spec | Fugu Ultra v2 | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Sakana AI | InclusionAI | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 262K tokens | SAFugu Ultra v2 |
| Input price | $5/M | $0.08/M | INLing 3.1 Flash |
| Output price | $30/M | $0.22/M | INLing 3.1 Flash |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | No | SAFugu Ultra v2 |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Ling 3.1 Flash is ~136× cheaper than Fugu Ultra v2 on output tokens ($0.22 vs $30 per M tokens).
| Capability | Fugu Ultra v2 | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✗ |
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
| Criterion | Fugu Ultra v2 | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
Fugu Ultra v2 is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to...
Ling 3.1 Flash is a hybrid reasoning mixture-of-experts model from inclusionAI, with 25B active parameters out of 560B total.
Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper on output ($0.22/M vs $30/M).
Fugu Ultra v2 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).
Choose Ling 3.1 Flash for the lower output price ($0.22/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra v2 if you need the larger 1M context window.
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →