AI Models · Paid vs Paid

SAFugu Ultra v2 Paid vs INLing 3.0 Flash Fin Paid

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Fugu Ultra v2 — full profile ›  ·  Ling 3.0 Flash Fin — full profile ›

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

SAFugu Ultra v2PaidSakana AI
$5 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
INLing 3.0 Flash FinPaidInclusionAI
$0.06 /M input
$0.18 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin for the lower output price ($0.18/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra v2 if you need the larger 1M context window.

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specs

SpecFugu Ultra v2Ling 3.0 Flash FinWinner
MakerSakana AIInclusionAI–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window1M tokens262K tokensSAFugu Ultra v2
Input price$5/M$0.06/MINLing 3.0 Flash Fin
Output price$30/M$0.18/MINLing 3.0 Flash Fin
Vision / multimodalYesNoSAFugu Ultra v2
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

167×cheaper per output token

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is ~167× cheaper than Fugu Ultra v2 on output tokens ($0.18 vs $30 per M tokens).

SAChoose Fugu Ultra v2 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
INChoose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityFugu Ultra v2Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✗
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✓✗

How Fugu Ultra v2 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.1 vs 3.0 / 5).
CriterionFugu Ultra v2Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Cost-efficiency3.05.0
Context window5.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Fugu Ultra v2 Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Fugu Ultra v2 is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to...

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin Paid

InclusionAI · Proprietary

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is a finance-focused mixture-of-experts model from InclusionAI, built on Ling 3.0 Flash with 5.1B active parameters out of 124B total. It is designed for real-world investment...

Frequently asked questions

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin — which is cheaper?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is cheaper on output ($0.18/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Fugu Ultra v2 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin for the lower output price ($0.18/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra v2 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Hy3 vs Fugu Ultra v2Hy3 vs Ling 3.0 Flash FinGLM 5.3 vs Fugu Ultra v2GLM 5.3 vs Ling 3.0 Flash FinDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Fugu Ultra v2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →