SAFugu Ultra v2 Paid vs 
Claude Opus 5.5 Paid
Fugu Ultra v2 vs Claude Opus 5.5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
Fugu Ultra v2 — full profile › · Claude Opus 5.5 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$20 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
Fugu Ultra v2 vs Claude Opus 5.5 specs
| Spec | Fugu Ultra v2 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Sakana AI | Anthropic | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens | = Tie |
| Input price | $5/M | $4/M | |
| Output price | $30/M | $20/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Claude Opus 5.5 is ~1.5× cheaper than Fugu Ultra v2 on output tokens ($20 vs $30 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | Fugu Ultra v2 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✓ |
Benchmarks: Fugu Ultra v2 vs Claude Opus 5.5
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How Fugu Ultra v2 and Claude Opus 5.5 score
| Criterion | Fugu Ultra v2 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
Fugu Ultra v2 Paid
Fugu Ultra v2 is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to...
Claude Opus 5.5 Paid
Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work, succeeding Claude Opus 5. It is particularly strong at multi-step changes in large codebases, code...
Other models in these families
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
Frequently asked questions
Fugu Ultra v2 vs Claude Opus 5.5 — which is cheaper?
Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper on output ($20/M vs $30/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Fugu Ultra v2 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).
Fugu Ultra v2 vs Claude Opus 5.5 — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for the lower output price ($20/M vs $30/M). Choose Fugu Ultra v2 if you need the larger 1M context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →