AI Models · Paid vs Paid

FIEmber-1 Paid vs RERelace Apply 3 Paid

Ember-1 vs Relace Apply 3 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Ember-1 — full profile ›  ·  Relace Apply 3 — full profile ›

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

FIEmber-1PaidFireworks
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
RERelace Apply 3PaidRelace
$0.85 /M input
$1.25 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window256K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Relace Apply 3 for the lower output price ($1.25/M vs $15/M). Choose Ember-1 if you need the larger 1M context window.

Ember-1 vs Relace Apply 3 specs

SpecEmber-1Relace Apply 3Winner
MakerFireworksRelace–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window1M tokens256K tokensFIEmber-1
Input price$3/M$0.85/MRERelace Apply 3
Output price$15/M$1.25/MRERelace Apply 3
Vision / multimodalYesNoFIEmber-1
Tool / function callingYesNoFIEmber-1
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

12×cheaper per output token

Relace Apply 3 is ~12× cheaper than Ember-1 on output tokens ($1.25 vs $15 per M tokens).

FIChoose Ember-1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
REChoose Relace Apply 3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityEmber-1Relace Apply 3
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✗
Tool / function calling✓✗
1M+ context window✓✗

How Ember-1 and Relace Apply 3 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Ember-1 (3.1 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionEmber-1Relace Apply 3
Cost-efficiency3.04.5
Context window5.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.02.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Ember-1 Paid

Fireworks · Proprietary

Ember-1 is a specialized reasoning model from Fireworks Research, built on [Kimi K3](https://openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k3). It is designed to make every token go further: it produces shorter reasoning traces, using roughly 40%...

Relace Apply 3 Paid

Relace · Proprietary

Relace Apply 3 is a specialized code-patching LLM that merges AI-suggested edits straight into your source files. It can apply updates from GPT-4o, Claude, and others into your files at...

Frequently asked questions

Ember-1 vs Relace Apply 3 — which is cheaper?

Relace Apply 3 is cheaper on output ($1.25/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Ember-1 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Ember-1 vs Relace Apply 3 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Relace Apply 3 for the lower output price ($1.25/M vs $15/M). Choose Ember-1 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ember-1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Relace Apply 3GLM 5.3 (batch) vs Ember-1GLM 5.3 (batch) vs Relace Apply 3Hy3 vs Ember-1Hy3 vs Relace Apply 3

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →