FIEmber-1 Paid vs 
GPT Audio Paid
Ember-1 vs GPT Audio compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
Ember-1 — full profile › · GPT Audio — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$10 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
Ember-1 vs GPT Audio specs
| Spec | Ember-1 | GPT Audio | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Fireworks | OpenAI | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 128K tokens | FIEmber-1 |
| Input price | $3/M | $2.5/M | |
| Output price | $15/M | $10/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | No | FIEmber-1 |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
GPT Audio is ~1.5× cheaper than Ember-1 on output tokens ($10 vs $15 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 1M context window
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | Ember-1 | GPT Audio |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✗ |
How Ember-1 and GPT Audio score
| Criterion | Ember-1 | GPT Audio |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
Ember-1 Paid
Ember-1 is a specialized reasoning model from Fireworks Research, built on [Kimi K3](https://openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k3). It is designed to make every token go further: it produces shorter reasoning traces, using roughly 40%...
GPT Audio Paid
The gpt-audio model is OpenAI's first generally available audio model. The new snapshot features an upgraded decoder for more natural sounding voices and maintains better voice consistency. Audio is priced...
Frequently asked questions
Ember-1 vs GPT Audio — which is cheaper?
GPT Audio is cheaper on output ($10/M vs $15/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Ember-1 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).
Ember-1 vs GPT Audio — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose GPT Audio for the lower output price ($10/M vs $15/M). Choose Ember-1 if you need the larger 1M context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →