FIEmber-1 Paid vs 
Claude Haiku 5.5 Paid
Ember-1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
Ember-1 — full profile › · Claude Haiku 5.5 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$0.5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
Ember-1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 specs
| Spec | Ember-1 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Fireworks | Anthropic | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens | FIEmber-1 |
| Input price | $3/M | $0.1/M | |
| Output price | $15/M | $0.5/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Claude Haiku 5.5 is ~30× cheaper than Ember-1 on output tokens ($0.5 vs $15 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 1M context window
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | Ember-1 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✓ |
Benchmarks: Ember-1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How Ember-1 and Claude Haiku 5.5 score
| Criterion | Ember-1 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
Ember-1 Paid
Ember-1 is a specialized reasoning model from Fireworks Research, built on [Kimi K3](https://openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k3). It is designed to make every token go further: it produces shorter reasoning traces, using roughly 40%...
Claude Haiku 5.5 Paid
Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding, computer use, and...
Other models in these families
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
Frequently asked questions
Ember-1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 — which is cheaper?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper on output ($0.5/M vs $15/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Ember-1 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).
Ember-1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for the lower output price ($0.5/M vs $15/M). Choose Ember-1 if you need the larger 1M context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →