North Mini Code (free) Open vs SAFugu Ultra v2 Paid
North Mini Code (free) vs Fugu Ultra v2 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.
Fugu Ultra v2 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
Free /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
North Mini Code (free) vs Fugu Ultra v2 specs
| Spec | North Mini Code (free) | Fugu Ultra v2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Cohere | Sakana AI | – |
| Type | Open-weight | Proprietary | |
| Context window | 256K tokens | 1M tokens | SAFugu Ultra v2 |
| Input price | Free/M · free self-host | $5/M | |
| Output price | Free/M · free self-host | $30/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | No | Yes | SAFugu Ultra v2 |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No (API only) | |
| License | Open weights | Proprietary |
Price gap & when to choose each
- You want to self-host or run on your cloud
- You prioritize data privacy & control
- You want the lowest operating costs
- You are building open or reproducible AI
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 1M context window
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | North Mini Code (free) | Fugu Ultra v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✓ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✗ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✓ |
Benchmarks: North Mini Code (free) vs Fugu Ultra v2
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How North Mini Code (free) and Fugu Ultra v2 score
| Criterion | North Mini Code (free) | Fugu Ultra v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Context window | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Openness | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 5.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
North Mini Code (free) Open
North Mini Code is Cohere's first agentic coding model and the debut of its North family. A sparse mixture-of-experts model with 30B total parameters and 3B active, it is optimized...
Fugu Ultra v2 Paid
Fugu Ultra v2 is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to...
Frequently asked questions
Is North Mini Code (free) as good as Fugu Ultra v2?
North Mini Code (free) is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Fugu Ultra v2 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.
Can I run North Mini Code (free) locally?
Yes. North Mini Code (free) has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Fugu Ultra v2 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.
North Mini Code (free) vs Fugu Ultra v2 — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose North Mini Code (free) if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Fugu Ultra v2 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →