AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Claude Opus 4.8 Paid vs GPT-5.6 Terra Paid

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Terra compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Claude Opus 4.8 — full profile ›  ·  GPT-5.6 Terra — full profile ›

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · OpenSourceAI.tech

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose GPT-5.6 Terra for the lower output price ($15/M vs $25/M). It also gives you the larger 1.1M context window.

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Terra specs

SpecClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 Terra
MakerAnthropicOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens1.1M tokens
Input price$5/M$2.5/M
Output price$25/M$15/M
Vision / multimodalYesYes
Tool / function callingYesYes
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 Terra
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✓✓

Benchmarks: Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Claude Opus 4.8
GPT-5.6 Terra
Intelligence index
55.7
55
Coding index
74.3
76.7
GPQA
92%
92.5%
Humanity's Last Exam
45.7%
41.8%
Long Context Reasoning
67.7%
74%
SciCode
53.5%
53.9%
IFBench
62.2%
71.2%
τ²-Bench
94.4%
86.3%
τ-Bench Banking
27.6%
31.8%
Terminal-Bench
84.6%
88%
Terminal-Bench Hard
58.3%
57.6%
Speed
62.5 tok/s
153.9 tok/s
Latency
28.57s
102.59s
Intelligence per $
5.6
9.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6 Terra score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.1 vs 3.1 / 5).
CriterionClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 Terra
Cost-efficiency3.03.0
Context window5.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Claude Opus 4.8 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic's most capable generally available model in the Opus family. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and a 1M-token...

GPT-5.6 Terra Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-5.6 Terra is a balanced model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series, positioned between the flagship Sol tier and the cost-efficient Luna tier. It is suited for everyday coding, reasoning, and agentic...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.6

Frequently asked questions

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Terra — which is cheaper?

GPT-5.6 Terra is cheaper on output ($15/M vs $25/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.6 Terra offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Terra — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-5.6 Terra for the lower output price ($15/M vs $25/M). It also gives you the larger 1.1M context window.

People also compare

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.8DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 TerraGLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 TerraMiniMax M3 vs Claude Opus 4.8MiniMax M3 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →