AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Claude Opus 5 Paid vs SAFugu Max Paid

Claude Opus 5 vs Fugu Max compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Claude Opus 5PaidAnthropic
$5 /M input
$25 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
SAFugu MaxPaidSakana AI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Fugu Max for the lower output price ($6/M vs $25/M). Choose Claude Opus 5 if you need the larger 1M context window.

Claude Opus 5 vs Fugu Max specs

SpecClaude Opus 5Fugu MaxWinner
MakerAnthropicSakana AI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens1M tokens= Tie
Input price$5/M$2/MSAFugu Max
Output price$25/M$6/MSAFugu Max
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

4.2×cheaper per output token

Fugu Max is ~4.2× cheaper than Claude Opus 5 on output tokens ($6 vs $25 per M tokens).

Choose Claude Opus 5 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
SAChoose Fugu Max if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityClaude Opus 5Fugu Max
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Claude Opus 5 vs Fugu Max

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Claude Opus 5
Fugu Max
Intelligence index
50.7
Coding index
78
GPQA
93.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
54.9%
Long Context Reasoning
79.3%
SciCode
56.4%
τ-Bench Banking
42.1%
Terminal-Bench
89.1%
Speed
61.4 tok/s
Latency
36.03s
Intelligence per $
5.1

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Claude Opus 5 and Fugu Max score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.1 vs 3.3 / 5).
CriterionClaude Opus 5Fugu Max
Cost-efficiency3.04.0
Context window5.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Claude Opus 5 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic’s flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work. It is particularly strong at end-to-end software tasks, code review and bug finding, visual analysis...

Fugu Max Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Fugu Max is the cost-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to route...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Claude Opus 5 (batch)Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7 (batch)Claude Opus 4.6Claude Opus 4.6 (batch)Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)Claude Opus 4.1Claude Opus 4.1 (batch)Claude Opus 4

Frequently asked questions

Claude Opus 5 vs Fugu Max — which is cheaper?

Fugu Max is cheaper on output ($6/M vs $25/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Opus 5 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Claude Opus 5 vs Fugu Max — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Fugu Max for the lower output price ($6/M vs $25/M). Choose Claude Opus 5 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →