AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Claude Fable 5 Paid vs Sonar Pro Paid

Claude Fable 5 vs Sonar Pro compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Claude Fable 5PaidAnthropic
$10 /M input
$50 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Sonar ProPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Sonar Pro for the lower output price ($15/M vs $50/M). Choose Claude Fable 5 if you need the larger 1M context window.

Claude Fable 5 vs Sonar Pro specs

SpecClaude Fable 5Sonar ProWinner
MakerAnthropicPerplexity
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens200K tokensClaude Fable 5
Input price$10/M$3/MSonar Pro
Output price$50/M$15/MSonar Pro
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesNoClaude Fable 5
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

3.3×cheaper per output token

Sonar Pro is ~3.3× cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on output tokens ($15 vs $50 per M tokens).

Choose Claude Fable 5 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Sonar Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityClaude Fable 5Sonar Pro
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Claude Fable 5 vs Sonar Pro

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Claude Fable 5
Sonar Pro
Intelligence index
49.7
7.6
Coding index
76.5
GPQA
92.6%
57.8%
Humanity's Last Exam
55.5%
6.6%
Long Context Reasoning
82.3%
SciCode
61%
IFBench
63.5%
τ²-Bench
98.5%
τ-Bench Banking
38.1%
Terminal-Bench
84.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
62.9%
MMLU-Pro
75.5%
LiveCodeBench
27.5%
MATH-500
74.5%
AIME
29%
Speed
70 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
60.71s
0s
Intelligence per $
2.5

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Claude Fable 5 and Sonar Pro score

🏆 Best value & openness: Claude Fable 5 (2.9 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionClaude Fable 5Sonar Pro
Cost-efficiency2.03.0
Context window5.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Claude Fable 5 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Fable 5 is a Mythos-class model from Anthropic, built for autonomous knowledge work and coding. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and...

Sonar Pro Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Note: Sonar Pro pricing includes Perplexity search pricing. See [details here](https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/pricing#detailed-pricing-breakdown-for-sonar-reasoning-pro-and-sonar-pro) For enterprises seeking more advanced capabilities, t

Frequently asked questions

Claude Fable 5 vs Sonar Pro — which is cheaper?

Sonar Pro is cheaper on output ($15/M vs $50/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Fable 5 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Claude Fable 5 vs Sonar Pro — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Sonar Pro for the lower output price ($15/M vs $50/M). Choose Claude Fable 5 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →