AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Claude Fable 5 Paid vs Solar Pro 3 Paid

Claude Fable 5 vs Solar Pro 3 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Claude Fable 5PaidAnthropic
$10 /M input
$50 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Solar Pro 3PaidUpstage
$0.15 /M input
$0.6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Solar Pro 3 for the lower output price ($0.6/M vs $50/M). Choose Claude Fable 5 if you need the larger 1M context window.

Claude Fable 5 vs Solar Pro 3 specs

SpecClaude Fable 5Solar Pro 3Winner
MakerAnthropicUpstage
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens131K tokensClaude Fable 5
Input price$10/M$0.15/MSolar Pro 3
Output price$50/M$0.6/MSolar Pro 3
Vision / multimodalYesNoClaude Fable 5
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

83×cheaper per output token

Solar Pro 3 is ~83× cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on output tokens ($0.6 vs $50 per M tokens).

Choose Claude Fable 5 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Solar Pro 3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityClaude Fable 5Solar Pro 3
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Claude Fable 5 vs Solar Pro 3

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Solar Pro 3 delivers 12× more intelligence per dollar.
Claude Fable 5
Solar Pro 3
Intelligence index
49.7
7.8
Coding index
76.5
16.2
GPQA
92.6%
72.4%
Humanity's Last Exam
55.5%
10.3%
Long Context Reasoning
82.3%
32.3%
SciCode
61%
25.5%
IFBench
63.5%
71.2%
τ²-Bench
98.5%
86.3%
τ-Bench Banking
38.1%
8.7%
Terminal-Bench
84.6%
12%
Terminal-Bench Hard
62.9%
7.6%
Speed
70 tok/s
157.2 tok/s
Latency
60.71s
1.33s
Intelligence per $
2.5
29.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Claude Fable 5 and Solar Pro 3 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.9 vs 2.9 / 5).
CriterionClaude Fable 5Solar Pro 3
Cost-efficiency2.05.0
Context window5.03.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Claude Fable 5 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Fable 5 is a Mythos-class model from Anthropic, built for autonomous knowledge work and coding. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and...

Solar Pro 3 Paid

Upstage · Proprietary

Solar Pro 3 is Upstage's powerful Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model. With 102B total parameters and 12B active parameters per forward pass, it delivers exceptional performance while maintaining computational efficiency. Optimized...

Frequently asked questions

Claude Fable 5 vs Solar Pro 3 — which is cheaper?

Solar Pro 3 is cheaper on output ($0.6/M vs $50/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Fable 5 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Claude Fable 5 vs Solar Pro 3 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Solar Pro 3 for the lower output price ($0.6/M vs $50/M). Choose Claude Fable 5 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →