AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Claude Fable 5 Paid vs Seed-2.0-Mini Paid

Claude Fable 5 vs Seed-2.0-Mini compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Claude Fable 5PaidAnthropic
$10 /M input
$50 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Seed-2.0-MiniPaidByteDance Seed
$0.1 /M input
$0.4 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Seed-2.0-Mini for the lower output price ($0.4/M vs $50/M). Choose Claude Fable 5 if you need the larger 1M context window.

Claude Fable 5 vs Seed-2.0-Mini specs

SpecClaude Fable 5Seed-2.0-MiniWinner
MakerAnthropicByteDance Seed
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens262K tokensClaude Fable 5
Input price$10/M$0.1/MSeed-2.0-Mini
Output price$50/M$0.4/MSeed-2.0-Mini
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

125×cheaper per output token

Seed-2.0-Mini is ~125× cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on output tokens ($0.4 vs $50 per M tokens).

Choose Claude Fable 5 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Seed-2.0-Mini if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityClaude Fable 5Seed-2.0-Mini
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Claude Fable 5 vs Seed-2.0-Mini

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Claude Fable 5
Seed-2.0-Mini
Intelligence index
49.7
Coding index
76.5
GPQA
92.6%
Humanity's Last Exam
55.5%
Long Context Reasoning
82.3%
SciCode
61%
IFBench
63.5%
τ²-Bench
98.5%
τ-Bench Banking
38.1%
Terminal-Bench
84.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
62.9%
Speed
70 tok/s
Latency
60.71s
Intelligence per $
2.5

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Claude Fable 5 and Seed-2.0-Mini score

🏆 Best value & openness: Seed-2.0-Mini (3.3 vs 2.9 / 5)
CriterionClaude Fable 5Seed-2.0-Mini
Cost-efficiency2.05.0
Context window5.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Claude Fable 5 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Fable 5 is a Mythos-class model from Anthropic, built for autonomous knowledge work and coding. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and...

Seed-2.0-Mini Paid

ByteDance Seed · Proprietary

Seed-2.0-mini targets latency-sensitive, high-concurrency, and cost-sensitive scenarios, emphasizing fast response and flexible inference deployment. It delivers performance comparable to ByteDance-Seed-1.6, supports 256k context, four reas

Frequently asked questions

Claude Fable 5 vs Seed-2.0-Mini — which is cheaper?

Seed-2.0-Mini is cheaper on output ($0.4/M vs $50/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Fable 5 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Claude Fable 5 vs Seed-2.0-Mini — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Seed-2.0-Mini for the lower output price ($0.4/M vs $50/M). Choose Claude Fable 5 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →