Claude Fable 5 Paid vs RERelace Apply 3 Paid
Claude Fable 5 vs Relace Apply 3 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
Claude Fable 5 — full profile › · Relace Apply 3 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$50 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$1.25 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
Claude Fable 5 vs Relace Apply 3 specs
| Spec | Claude Fable 5 | Relace Apply 3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Relace | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 256K tokens | |
| Input price | $10/M | $0.85/M | RERelace Apply 3 |
| Output price | $50/M | $1.25/M | RERelace Apply 3 |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | No | |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | No | |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Relace Apply 3 is ~40× cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on output tokens ($1.25 vs $50 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 1M context window
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | Claude Fable 5 | Relace Apply 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✗ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: Claude Fable 5 vs Relace Apply 3
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How Claude Fable 5 and Relace Apply 3 score
| Criterion | Claude Fable 5 | Relace Apply 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 2.0 | 4.5 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 2.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
Claude Fable 5 Paid
Claude Fable 5 is a Mythos-class model from Anthropic, built for autonomous knowledge work and coding. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and...
Relace Apply 3 Paid
Relace Apply 3 is a specialized code-patching LLM that merges AI-suggested edits straight into your source files. It can apply updates from GPT-4o, Claude, and others into your files at...
Frequently asked questions
Claude Fable 5 vs Relace Apply 3 — which is cheaper?
Relace Apply 3 is cheaper on output ($1.25/M vs $50/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Fable 5 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).
Claude Fable 5 vs Relace Apply 3 — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Relace Apply 3 for the lower output price ($1.25/M vs $50/M). Choose Claude Fable 5 if you need the larger 1M context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →