AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Claude Fable 5 Paid vs SCExtract Paid

Claude Fable 5 vs Extract compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Claude Fable 5 — full profile ›  ·  Extract — full profile ›

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Claude Fable 5PaidAnthropic
$10 /M input
$50 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
SCExtractPaidScaledown
$0.04 /M input
Free /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Extract for the lower output price (Free/M vs $50/M). Choose Claude Fable 5 if you need the larger 1M context window.

Claude Fable 5 vs Extract specs

SpecClaude Fable 5ExtractWinner
MakerAnthropicScaledown–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window1M tokens1M tokens= Tie
Input price$10/M$0.04/MSCExtract
Output price$50/MFree/MSCExtract
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesNoClaude Fable 5
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

Choose Claude Fable 5 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
SCChoose Extract if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityClaude Fable 5Extract
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✓✗
1M+ context window✓✓

Benchmarks: Claude Fable 5 vs Extract

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Claude Fable 5
Extract
Intelligence index
49.6
–
Coding index
76.5
–
GPQA
92.6%
–
Humanity's Last Exam
55.5%
–
Long Context Reasoning
82.3%
–
SciCode
61%
–
IFBench
63.5%
–
τ²-Bench
98.5%
–
τ-Bench Banking
38.1%
–
Terminal-Bench
84.6%
–
Terminal-Bench Hard
62.9%
–
Speed
0 tok/s
–
Latency
0s
–
Intelligence per $
2.5
–

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Claude Fable 5 and Extract score

🏆 Best value & openness: Extract (3.2 vs 2.9 / 5)
CriterionClaude Fable 5Extract
Cost-efficiency2.05.0
Context window5.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Claude Fable 5 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Fable 5 is a Mythos-class model from Anthropic, built for autonomous knowledge work and coding. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and...

Extract Paid

Scaledown · Proprietary

Extract is a description-driven entity extraction model from ScaleDown. Instead of a fixed set of entity types, callers describe the fields they want in plain English through `provider.options.scaledown.entities`, and the...

Frequently asked questions

Claude Fable 5 vs Extract — which is cheaper?

Extract is cheaper on output (Free/M vs $50/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Fable 5 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Claude Fable 5 vs Extract — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Extract for the lower output price (Free/M vs $50/M). Choose Claude Fable 5 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs ExtractGLM 5.3 (batch) vs Claude Fable 5GLM 5.3 (batch) vs ExtractHy3 vs Claude Fable 5Hy3 vs Extract

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →