Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) Paid vs WRPalmyra X5 Paid
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Palmyra X5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) — full profile › · Palmyra X5 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$25 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Palmyra X5 specs
| Spec | Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) | Palmyra X5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Writer | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens | WRPalmyra X5 |
| Input price | $5/M | $0.6/M | WRPalmyra X5 |
| Output price | $25/M | $6/M | WRPalmyra X5 |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | No | |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | No | |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Palmyra X5 is ~4.2× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) on output tokens ($6 vs $25 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 1M context window
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) | Palmyra X5 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✗ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✓ |
Benchmarks: Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Palmyra X5
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) and Palmyra X5 score
| Criterion | Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) | Palmyra X5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 2.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) Paid
Claude Fable 5.1 improves on Claude Fable 5 across the board, with the biggest gains in agentic coding, long-running agentic workflows, and knowledge work: long code refactors, front-end and visual...
Palmyra X5 Paid
Palmyra X5 is Writer's most advanced model, purpose-built for building and scaling AI agents across the enterprise. It delivers industry-leading speed and efficiency on context windows up to 1 million...
Frequently asked questions
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Palmyra X5 — which is cheaper?
Palmyra X5 is cheaper on output ($6/M vs $25/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Palmyra X5 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Palmyra X5 — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Palmyra X5 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $25/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →