AI Models · Paid vs Paid

AIAion-3.0 Paid vs INMercury 2 Paid

Aion-3.0 vs Mercury 2 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

AIAion-3.0PaidAionLabs
$3 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
INMercury 2PaidInception
$0.25 /M input
$0.75 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Mercury 2 for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $6/M). Choose Aion-3.0 if you need the larger 131K context window.

Aion-3.0 vs Mercury 2 specs

SpecAion-3.0Mercury 2Winner
MakerAionLabsInception
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window131K tokens128K tokensAIAion-3.0
Input price$3/M$0.25/MINMercury 2
Output price$6/M$0.75/MINMercury 2
Vision / multimodalNoNo
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

8.0×cheaper per output token

Mercury 2 is ~8.0× cheaper than Aion-3.0 on output tokens ($0.75 vs $6 per M tokens).

AIChoose Aion-3.0 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 131K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
INChoose Mercury 2 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityAion-3.0Mercury 2
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Aion-3.0 vs Mercury 2

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Aion-3.0
Mercury 2
Intelligence index
11.5
Coding index
31.1
GPQA
77%
Humanity's Last Exam
17.1%
Long Context Reasoning
43.7%
SciCode
37.7%
IFBench
69.8%
τ²-Bench
70.8%
τ-Bench Banking
9.5%
Terminal-Bench
27.3%
Terminal-Bench Hard
26.5%
Speed
1011.9 tok/s
Latency
4.14s
Intelligence per $
30.7

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Aion-3.0 and Mercury 2 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.7 vs 2.9 / 5).
CriterionAion-3.0Mercury 2
Cost-efficiency4.05.0
Context window3.53.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.53.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Aion-3.0 Paid

AionLabs · Proprietary

Aion-3.0 is a multi-model roleplaying and storytelling system from AionLabs, built on the GLM family of models. It uses a collaborative generation process in which multiple specialized models each contribute...

Mercury 2 Paid

Inception · Proprietary

Mercury 2 is an extremely fast reasoning LLM, and the first reasoning diffusion LLM (dLLM). Instead of generating tokens sequentially, Mercury 2 produces and refines multiple tokens in parallel, achieving...

Frequently asked questions

Aion-3.0 vs Mercury 2 — which is cheaper?

Mercury 2 is cheaper on output ($0.75/M vs $6/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Aion-3.0 offers the larger context window (131K tokens).

Aion-3.0 vs Mercury 2 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Mercury 2 for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $6/M). Choose Aion-3.0 if you need the larger 131K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →